“The world in which you were born is just one model of
reality. Other cultures are not failed attempts at being YOU:
they are unique manifestations of the human spirit.” – Wade Davis (emphasis
added) (I credit my daughter with bringing this quote to my attention)
This quote captures something of the difference between an
ethnocentric and an ethnorelative / global minset, in how we look at others.
When we are ethnocentric,
i.e., centered in our own people (our own ethne), we are unaware that there are
different ways of being human (as represented, for example, in the variations
between being “individualist” vs. “collectivist” when it comes to how
individuals are seen in relation to the group, being “monochronic” vs. “polychronic”
when it comes to how we view and experience time and tasks, variations in group
norms and customs, worldview, etc. – all the ways in which cultures differ). We
lack both “self-awareness” and “other-awareness,” relate to others as if they
were us, and inevitably judge them for ways they fall short (i.e., they don’t do
things or see things rightly). We see them as “failed attempts at being me.”
Back to a Myers-Briggs example, as a strong “thinker” on the
MBTI, for a long time I was frustrated with people who let feelings “get in the
way” in a discussion (rather than “simply” focusing on “facts” or “truth”). It
disturbed me when in a discussion, someone would become emotional or get their
feelings hurt. Then I learned of the “thinker”/”feeler” distinction in MBTI
terms, that these are two basically different ways (on a spectrum, of course,
with a range of variation) of processing information and interacting with
others, in terms of the way feelings are (or are not) involved. Becoming aware
of this, I was able to begin to appreciate that different others were, well,
different than me (and not to be measured against my way of experiencing life,
but to be appreciated as the unique humans they are).
As we get to know different others as different (in any of the ways that they are different, and this
works on an interpersonal as well as on an intercultural level) but equally human, we come to know ourselves
more deeply as well, and we have a more multifaceted understanding of the
reality that there are a range of unique manifestations of the human spirit. We
see ourselves, our ways of being human, in the context of other ways of being
human. This is what it means to have an ethnorelative
(or global) mindset – we see our
people (our ethnos) in the context of
the spectrum of kalaidescope of peoples.
No comments:
Post a Comment